Epic vs Google
-
Epic explains why it hasn't sued Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft over 30% fee | Epic vs Google
Fortnite firm says platform holders' hardware losses justify the need to charge devs for game sales and microtransactions
-
.png?width=400&height=225&fit=crop&quality=70&format=jpg&auto=webp)
Activision Blizzard planned to open "Steam of mobile" store | Epic vs Google
The firm sought to partner with Epic Games or Supercell to launch a mobile games marketplace
-
Judge orders Epic, Google to hold settlement talks | Epic vs Google
Fortnite firm has also been told to file demands by the end of the week, Google must reply with 48 hours
-
Tim Sweeney: We were willing to sue Sony for cross-play | Epic vs Google
Elsewhere, more details emerge over Google's plans to buy the Fortnite firm
-
OnePlus, Samsung say they were restricted from including Fortnite in app stores | Epic vs Google
Google says OnePlus omitted Epic game by choice, and Samsung inclusion enabled malicious 'fake Fortnite' app
-
Epic turned down $147m deal to put Fortnite on Google Play | Epic vs Google
Judge also confirms court exhibits will not be publicly accessible until after the antitrust trial concludes
-
Epic, Google antitrust trial is a "tough case to predict" | Epic vs Google
Legal experts weigh in on the potential outcome of Epic's latest legal battle, and the influence of its dispute with Apple
-
Epic accuses Google of "bribe or block" dominance on Android | Epic vs Google
Google's opening statement emphasises openness of Android and competition with Apple
-
30% is "a market fee, not a monopoly fee," says Google | Epic vs Google
Google defends share of all transactions, as Epic reveals its game store is still not profitable
-
Epic vs Google antitrust trial begins today
Fortnite firm continues crusade against 30% cut and anti-steering practices despite struggles in case against Apple